Complete Intelligence

Categories
Podcasts

Financial Insights: Deciphering the Fed, Market Reactions, and Global Implications

This podcast was first and originally published by Peter Lewis’ Money Talk. Find the Substack here:

https://peterlewismoneytalk.substack.com/p/peter-lewis-money-talk-friday-22-6c2

Topics discussed:

  • Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s perceived dovish stance is critiqued for potentially leading to increased inflation and discontent among voters.
  • Market reactions to the Federal Reserve meeting were positive, resulting in a broad rally across various asset classes.
  • Concerns are expressed about the impact of new legislation in Hong Kong, particularly on foreign investors and the perceived shift towards authoritarianism.
  • The potential implications of stricter laws on data privacy and state secrets in Hong Kong are discussed, raising concerns about its impact on the region’s business environment.

Transcript

Peter Lewis

Tony, what are your thoughts? I mean, it’s interesting, isn’t it, because he’s raised the inflation forecast. He’s raised his growth forecast quite considerably, but no change to the number of rate cuts this year, although we did get one taken off for next year, didn’t we? There was going to be four next year. Now they’re only talking about three year. So I suppose one of the rate cuts has come out for next year. But what are your thoughts?

Tony Nash

I think it’s silly, Peter. We can’t be raising our economic expectations, seeing wages rise, seeing prices rise, raising our inflation expectations and saying, oh, yeah, we’re going to make money easier. Right. And he even said during the meeting that they were going to slow the pace of the offtake from the fed balance sheet. They’re cultivating an environment for pretty easy money where demand seems to be right now. And that’s how markets took it. Markets took it after the meeting and they just ran with it because he came across as very dovish. In fact, Powell has a way of coming across either way too hawkish or way too dovish. And then other Fed speakers have to course correct in the following days. So I think he probably came off way too dovish. And I think we’re going to see fed speakers over the next week. Correct. More on the hawkish side to say, whoa, that’s not really what we meant. And I really think that that’s what’s going to happen is they’ll make the three interest rate cuts seem more questionable than they are. Although the vote was unanimous, we did see a slightly more hawkish trend in the dots.

Tony Nash

Not a lot, but slightly more hawkish.

Peter Lewis

And what was also interesting was out of the 19 FOMC members, nine of them, so a minority, but a substantial minority, actually think the Fed is going to cut less than three times this year. So I think that’s maybe Jerome Powell is sort of out on a bit of a limb there, isn’t he?

Tony Nash

Yeah, I think you’re right. I do think that he does over calibrate either hawkish or dovish, depending on the direction, and I think he’s trying to signal the direction, but I think he always overdoes it just a little bit. He doesn’t have an easy job. Everyone reads everything into the way he holds his papers, the way he clears his throat or whatever. Right. I mean, everything is overly analyzed with him. But again, we have seen this where he comes out and he’s overly one way or the other. And I think, yeah, seeing those nine voters say hey, we’re not going to have three this year. I think as we’ve been talking about, my team has been talking about a resurgence in inflation for over a year, and we’ve seen it over the past couple of months, and we’re going to see that accelerate. They try to present Jan, Feb as just an aberration, but it’s not. And so it’s going to accelerate. Their expectations are going to be probably even exceeded. And it’s very difficult to have an interest rate cutting environment when you have inflation rising because it’s an election year.

Tony Nash

And consumers love, and voters love to complain justifiably about prices and prices keep rising. What did we see after the Fed meeting? We saw commodity prices soar. A lot of commodity prices soared after the Fed meeting, and that’s going to hit consumers within two. You know, this very unnecessarily dovish talk out of Powell has resulted in inflation definitely being locked in for at least two months.

Peter Lewis

Tony, I’m wondering what you think about this. Is the Fed taking a risk here? Because they basically seem to be saying the economy can run faster without generating significant overheating pressures and they’re willing to cut even while they’re still away from their target.

Tony Nash

Well, this is very similar to like a 2020 2021 argument when things were actually doing okay in the middle of COVID at least in the US, and people kept saying, hey, let it run hot. Let it run hot. Right. And it seems like we’re replaying that again, where, although people may not be using those words, the subtext is let it run hot. And I think the problem is, as Andrew was talking about GDP, the quality of that GDP is not great. It’s overwhelmingly government spending in terms of the growth areas. Okay, so we’re not having private sector growth as a contribution of GDP in the US. We’re having government spending as a growth area in GDP. And so what we’re seeing is heavy fiscal and we’re seeing dovish monetary. And so that’s great, but it just means that we’re going to see more inflation. Inflation is going to come back. Well, it already has, but it’s going to continue to accelerate. If this is the world that policymakers are comfortable with and if this is the world that policymakers are comfortable with, it makes us voters very unhappy because their pay rises are not keeping up with inflation.

Tony Nash

Now, what’s interesting, public sector pay rises are something like twice the size of private sector pay rises. So public sector wages are keeping up with inflation, but private sector wages aren’t and so this is the problem with an election year. American voters are really tired of it and inflation comes up in almost every discussion I have.

Peter Lewis


And I wonder what American voters also think about what he said about labor supply. He sort of mentioned the strength of the data on labor supply, but then he pointed to the strong pace of immigration as helping on that front. That’s rather a hot political topic to.

Tony Nash

It’s a lightning rod, and it’s not a very positive discussion in most parts of the US, even in very heavily democratic parts of the US, which favor inflation in state Massachusetts, New York, it is just a sour topic for people and it’s a very sensitive topic. So when the Fed chair gets up and says immigration is helping the labor market, it makes Americans very uncomfortable and it makes them not really like him.

Peter Lewis

Tony, what do you make of the market reaction to this? Jerome Powell didn’t talk down the rally at all, did he? In his press conference in either stocks or risk assets. He didn’t even acknowledge that this is easing financial conditions and maybe making their job a bit harder.

Tony Nash

He did not. And I think he turned it from a tech rally to an everything rally. If you look across markets at the close in the US today, and as you mentioned at the top of the program with Hong Kong was coming on strong this morning, international markets coming on strong this morning. I think with this, I think overly dovish Fed meeting, he turned the rally from a tech rally to an everything rally.

Peter Lewis

Do you think this is going to continue?

Tony Nash

It’s possible. I think we have to see how things go into the end of the week. If things stay strong into the end of the week, then look out. But I think if we start to see things stall out Thursday and Friday in the US, then we could see things settle back to the levels we had seen a few days ago.

Peter Lewis

Tony, if you look at the reaction of the yen to this, clearly the currency traders don’t think that this is the start of a sustained period of rate increases in Japan. And there’s still going to be that wide yield differential between US rates and Japanese rates.

Tony Nash

Yeah, it wasn’t a big statement. ET seems to be very conservative. He doesn’t want to be seen as shaking things up at the BOJ. He almost acts like a caretaker. And so I think currency traders expected something a little bit more. They want a little bit more in the end, want a little bit more. In terms of markets being slightly tighter, he’s not a big bold move maker and this just wasn’t it. So to see the end continue to weaken on this was just really interesting for me to watch this.

Peter Lewis

Okay. Okay, Tony, what are your thoughts? You’re obviously looking at this from overseas. As Andrew says, it’s no surprise it passed, and it passed with unanimous vote in ledge coat. But now that it has passed, and foreign investors are going to have a chance to scrutinize it and see the impact of it, is there anything to worry them?

Tony Nash

Oh, sure there is. I think the law allows trials without a jury. It allows trials behind closed doors. It allows handpicked judges. So anybody forming a company, anybody who’s a board member, anybody who’s an officer in a company, in a jurisdiction like Hong Kong, you have to worry. Why don’t you have a lot of international companies centered in Beijing because of laws like this, right? So Hong Kong, which 1020 years ago, 30 years ago, was the place to have a company because it was the most business friendly city in the world. Today it’s not that way. And if you’re an officer or director in a company, it’s got to be a little know, give you second. You know, one of the attractors for Hong Kong for a few decades has been media. There is great media in Hong Kong, but it’s no longer a media center, it’s no longer an arts center. And the sad part about that is a lot of that stuff is moving, or has moved to Singapore, which is a pretty strong state in terms of control of messages. So people are so worried about the impact of this new law on Hong Kong that they’re moving to Singapore and seeing it as a freer place than Hong Kong, completely 180 degrees from the way things were ten years ago?

Peter Lewis

John Lee and the government will say, what this Article 23 legislation does is it brings stability to Hong Kong. So will foreign investors look at that and say, yes, Hong Kong is more stable as a result of that, and that’s a positive.

Tony Nash

No, it brings opacity and it brings authoritarianism, in truth. And authoritarianism generally is stable until it. And so, you know, Singapore is an authoritarian place and it’s stable. It’s marginally freer than Hong Kong now, I guess. But no, authoritarianism doesn’t bring stability necessarily, or the stability it does bring is short lived. And again, Hong Kong was very vibrant, very creative, very interesting business hub. And I don’t think it’s totally gone, but I think the risks to officers, investors, board members and so on are much, much higher than they were before.

Peter Lewis

Tony, you are a financial analyst. If you were based in Hong Kong, would you be worried about this state secrets legislation or this state street secrets article that includes economic information, technological information on Hong Kong?

Tony Nash

Yeah, absolutely. So I used to be with a company called IHS, and it’s since been bought by S and P. But twelve or 15 years ago, there was an IHS analyst who lived in China who had some information on crude output or something like that, crude storage. And this person, from what I understand, got it from an industry association or something because they used it in a business environment. The chinese authorities prosecuted him and put him in jail for a long, long time. And at the time, I was working with the economist, but we were shocked at what was happening, because you used to be able to do research, find information, and if you could find information, you could use it to your advantage. And part of using things to your advantage is to trade on it. Right. And so if Hong Kong is to remain a vibrant financial center and a vibrant trading hub, you have to be able to dig for information. But if the Chinese authorities are going to prosecute people for finding information, then Hong Kong as a competitive center is no more. It just isn’t.

Peter Lewis

I mean, that’s what some people are worried about is that Hong Kong is becoming more like mainland China in terms of things like data privacy, state secrets, and what constitutes state secrets?

Tony Nash


Well, there are huge data centers in Hong Kong, right? I mean, there have been for 30 years. And so those data centers, I don’t know, a lot of foreign companies that people have their servers outside of China for a reason, and they have their data stored outside of China for a reason. These new laws allow the government to look into whatever they. So, you know, that stuff that has remained in Hong Kong, I’m sure at some point will move elsewhere if it’s remotely confidential.

Peter Lewis


Okay, well, thank you very much for your thoughts this morning. Great to hear you. That’s Tony Nash over in Texas, USA, who is the founder of Complete Intelligence.

Categories
Podcasts

BBC: Hong Kong’s Lawmakers Pass Tough Security Bill

This podcast is originally published by BBC Business Matters in this link with title “Hong Kong’s lawmakers pass tough security bill”: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w172yzs33f96cxs.

BBC’s Description:

The new law broadens the definition of state secrets in a way that could scare away investors. Will the city be able to maintain its place as a top financial hub?

The British band Chumbawamba is trying to prevent its biggest hit from being used by a politician in New Zealand. The lead singer tells us why.

And Star Wars creator George Lucas steps into the boardroom power battle at Disney to support the firm’s CEO, Bob Iger. Will the Force be with him?

Transcript

BBC


The new law also broadens the definition of state secrets to include information about the economic, technological and scientific development of Hong Kong or mainland China. And this has caused concerns among investors. Tony Nash is the CEO of AI forecasting platform complete intelligence. He also ran the Economist’s research business and their Asia headquarters in Hong Kong.

Tony Nash

Do I think first, we’ve seen legal agreements move to other jurisdictions, so that’s an easy thing to do. They can write it with UK law or something like that. We’ve also seen financial services staff and multinational staff move to other locations, like Singapore. I lived in Singapore for 15 years, and it’s a great place, but Hong Kong always had a very special buz. It had a level of hard work, creativity, intelligence. That Singapore, although it’s a really great pace, it didn’t have that special buz that Hong Kong had. So this stuff has people moving, it has business moving, and sadly, that specialness of Hong Kong is going with it.

BBC

Do you think there might be some businesses that might stick around in Hong Kong, or do you think that the rules are just too much for them?

Tony Nash

Sure, Hong Kong’s not dead. Companies still need people to do work in Hong Kong, but I think the decision makers and the people who are, say, the regional heads or the sea levels or the board members, those people will want to be in other places because of the potential liability that they have. Traders can trade on all kinds of information, and so if something is deemed a state secret and a trader uses some information that they’ve heard, there could be criminal prosecution for that. And so this was never a part of Hong Kong. Of course, things like insider trading are illegal, but I’ve been in the research business for a long time, and there’s a company called IHS that probably ten to twelve years ago had one of their researchers in China put in jail for getting some information that was relatively easy to get. It wasn’t hidden, but it was later deemed a state secret, and that person was put in was.

BBC

Sorry to interrupt you, Tony, but that uncertainty is just going to make it very difficult to do any business out there.

Tony Nash


That’s right, it is. And especially if decisions are made after the fact. Right. So this person had this information, it was deemed a state secret after this person had it, and that person went to jail for a long time. So these are the difficulties that executives and business leaders and researchers and media people face as and if they stay in Hong Kong.

Categories
Audio and Podcasts

Oil, Gold, Bitcoin, And Markets Are Up; Go Figure?

This podcast is originally and first published by BFM 89.9 in this link: https://www.bfm.my/podcast/morning-run/market-watch/oil-gold-bitcoin-markets-up-asset-classes-investment

BFM Description:

We appear to be living in strange times as almost all asset classes are up in tandem. We ask Tony Nash, CEO of Complete Intelligence to explain this conundrum and how to invest in these confusing times.

Transcript

BFM

So joining us on the line to tell us what’s going to be moving markets in the weeks ahead, we speak to Tony Nash, CEO of complete intelligence. Good morning, Tony. Now, let me ask you about what your views are in terms of the US CPI numbers, because it came in slightly higher than expected. I believe the figure was 3.2% for Febre, thanks to a pickup in housing and energy prices. Is inflation actually stickier than we think?

BFM

And what does this then mean for the Fed fund rate?

Tony

Yeah, it is stickier than we think. And if you annualize that, so that 3.2% was month on month. So if you annualize that, that inflation is back at 5.4%. So keep in mind that the Fed’s target is 2% inflation on an annualized basis. So we’re more than double that in America. So what does that mean? Well, there is a hope among, well, the current administration really wants a rate cut this year, and there are a lot of people in markets who are hoping for a rate cut. But as we see persistent inflation at the grocery store, with things like flights, with energy costs, with housing and other things, that cut is less and less likely.

BFM

And Tony, let’s look specifically at some of the sectors. I think the first one that really has caught my eye are the banks. Right now, they’ve paid out large dividends over the past year and also a lot of share buybacks. But with the net interest margins set to go down as a result of these expected rate cuts, will they be able to keep those payouts?

Tony

Yeah. So if we don’t see cut in rates, let’s say we don’t see cut in rates. We don’t expect we’ll see a rate cut before maybe Q three of this year, maybe even further than that if we continue to see persistent inflation. I’m not particularly worried about net interest margin for banks. I think initially rate cuts will not be as large as we saw them hike at the start. So I think we’d see tepid rate cuts at the start unless we saw a pretty dramatic downturn in the US. Now, in terms of buybacks with both banks and other segments, it’s really interesting to look at the amount of corporate debt announced in January and February. It’s a record, at least for the last ten years. And something like 20% to 30% of corporate debt issued is done for share buybacks. So we’re going to have to see what is announced for share buybacks probably in April May time period. But we expect there to be a lot of share buybacks this year, especially for those companies that issued debt in Janfeb.

BFM

So if we can look maybe, perhaps at some of the potential headwinds ahead, we are going to see US federal elections in November. It’s most likely going to be a Biden versus Trump rematch. How do you think investors are going to hedge potential political risks, particularly in equities?

Tony

Well, I think for Biden, I think they’re going to have to be careful of inflation because we’ve seen a lot of federal government spending under Biden. And of course, it was under Trump during COVID and Trump was a spender. But we’ve seen it accelerate under Biden, and we don’t see it slowing down necessarily. So in a second Biden administration, we’d expect the US debt to accelerate, especially if Janet Yellen is still the treasury secretary. She’s very good at issuing T bills to spend, and she’s very politically well connected, so she can get the authority to issue that from Congress. Under Trump, yeah, we would expect spending to slow a bit. And the way to hedge that play under a Trump administration is to look at, say, defense sectors. Under a Trump administration, defense likely wouldn’t do as well under Biden. We’ve seen wars in the Middle east and Ukraine, and we would expect things to at least stay where they are under Biden. Under Trump, there weren’t any wars. So we would expect that the defense sector wouldn’t really do very well under a Trump administration.

BFM

But, Tony, who is better for markets? Biden or.

Tony

Think? I think it cuts both ways. I’m a Republican, so I’m pulling for my party. It doesn’t matter who’s running. I think under Trump, we did see healthy markets without a lot of stimulus. And then, of course, the pandemic hit. And what we’ve seen since the pandemic is wave after wave of stimulus in the US that has really hit markets in a good way. Right? So under Trump, I don’t think we would see the level of stimulus that we would see under Biden. But Trump has also been vocal, saying that he would fire Jerome Powell, who he hired, who he put in place under his regime. So Trump is saying that he would want to cut interest rates. So it’s tricky both ways. And of course, presidents don’t like higher interest rates because they think that it slows down the economy in a very simplistic way. So I think it’s really a coin toss who’s better for markets? It really depends on the amount of fiscal and monetary firepower. I think the Democrats would bring fiscal firepower. I think the Republicans would bring monetary firepower.

BFM

And if we take a look at maybe another aspect, which is crude oil, we do see that oil prices have been rising on the back of diminishing US crude stockpiles. Why are oil inventories being depleted? And will the replenishing of those stocks push oil prices even further?

Tony

Yeah, oil prices are being depleted partly on production caps and partly on maintenance and other things. But crude markets, especially in the Middle east, very tight right now. They’re very tight. So as the US continues to replenish oil stocks in the SPR and other things, that will definitely push crude prices higher. They’ll try to buy opportunistically when prices are low. But as they refill the SPR and as other kind of storage in the US is refilled, that will definitely push prices higher, because the supply globally is so tight right now for both crude and for refined, you know, it’s really hard to see a downward spiral for crude in the next, say, month or two.

BFM

Tony, I have a question, because I’m stuck. If you look at cryptocurrencies, especially bitcoin, it’s like record high. $73,000, but gold, also record high. What does it tell you about markets, or at least sentiment, when equities are also at all time high? Aren’t those the two asset classes I mentioned earlier, defensive ones and commodities?

Tony

This is the problem with inflationary markets. It tells you that there’s a lot of money supply out there. It tells you that there’s more demand than there is supply. And I know people who invest in crypto, I know people who are aggressive crypto. I don’t see the inherent value of crypto, so I wouldn’t recommend anybody either way on that. But I think we do see, especially in the US, we see demand rising because it has to. Because we have inflationary markets. Demand is measured in dollars, it’s not measured in activity. So people will say, oh, the US economy is booming. Well, it’s booming because inflation is high. Right. And so because inflation is high, people have to consume more goods now. And that’s why we see so much demand on things, both because of the nominal value and because prices are going up. So it’s really hard to see anything fall until it does. Right. And those of us who’ve been around markets for 20 plus years, the music does kind of turn off and there are a lot of books I could recommend to you. But once interest rates rise, there is a lag before markets respond.

Tony

So things like cryptocurrency, that’s rallying because they’re in funds, they’re into index funds or, sorry, into ETFs and stuff. But other things, it’s because people are buying because the prices, they believe the prices will continue to rise. We haven’t seen any evidence that prices will fall outside of places like Europe and China, where they’re facing both economic headwinds and demographic headwinds. So that’s why we see things. Japan, China, Europe are slow because they have demographic issues. Of course, that’s a very slow issue, but they’re also seeing demand issues domestically in those markets.

BFM

Tony, thanks very much for speaking with us. That was Tony Nash, CEO of Complete Intelligence, giving us his take on some of the trends that he sees moving markets in the days and weeks ahead. We have a little bit of time on the clock, so we are going to turn our attention to some of the international corporate headlines that we’re watching this morning. We’ve got news coming out of Adidas. Adidas faced its first loss in over 30 years following the termination of its collaboration with Kanye west, which included the highly profitable Yeezy sneaker line. Despite the loss, though, Adidas shares performed well. They outperformed competitors like Nike and Puma. But the company’s decision to maintain its earnings forecast for 2024 at an operating profit of about €500 million did disappoint investors who were anticipating a more optimistic outlook.

BFM

I think the buyers of the stock are fans of the Adidas samba, which.

BFM

Is like the next cult is the big issue, right?

BFM

Yeah, it is the big couch shoe. So maybe people are thinking, who cares about these yeezys easys. We’re moving on. But if you look at the stock, actually yesterday it hit its all time high, traded at 200 and €1.55. Now, what does the street think of this? Are they optimistic? Because there were some write offs earlier on even before these results. And it’s somewhat evenly mixed because it’s 15 buys, 14 holes, just seven sells. Consensus target price for this german listed company, €187.91. Like I say, yesterday was an all time high. So it looks like markets. Who’s buying, I wonder? Maybe samba users.

BFM

Yeah, the fashionistas. I suppose you do see that. I think if we look at sales performance, north american sales are expected to decline due to market saturation. But really other markets are predicted to grow significantly. Yeah. Footwear sales grew by 8%, probably those sambas, while apparel sales fell by 13%. Okay, turning our attention to another stock and company, but this one in pretty big trouble. We see country garden. They’ve missed a coupon payment on a yuan bond for the first time, the latest difficulty faced by the chinese developer that is facing a lawsuit seeking its liquidation in Hong Kong. In response to this, the company said its main onshore unit hasn’t fully prepared a 96 million yuan coupon due on Tuesday for a 4.8% yuan bond maturing in 2026, and further emphasized that there is a 30 trading day grace period for this payment. So they’re trying to buy themselves some time.

BFM

I don’t know how much more time they can buy because they already defaulted on the offshore bonds. And then added to their pressure is the liquidation order by the Hong Kong courts where I think some people still argue, can it be enforced in China? So even the share price is really like all time low, down 25% on a year to date basis. The question is, I don’t think anybody’s going to buy this stock. It’s a question, can it survive? But amazingly, there’s still six buys on this name. Nine holes, six cells. This is listed in Hong Kong. It’s only fifty eight cents. Hong Kong Tiger price $0.63. Wow.

BFM

Some very brave six analysts there to still have a buy call. All right, 719 in the morning. We are going to head into some messages, but we’ll come back to cover the top stories in the newspapers and portals this morning. Stay tuned. BFM 89.9.

BFM

You have been listening to a podcast from BFM 89.9, the business station. For more stories of the same kind, download the BFM app.

Categories
Audio and Podcasts

Polls begin to close on Super Tuesday

This podcast was originally and first published by Business Matters.

BBC Description

Polls are beginning to close across the 15 primary states in the U.S as Super Tuesday comes to an end. Our presenter Roger Hearing will be bringing us up to date on what the polls are saying.

We’ll be hearing from voters who have made up their minds and those who are still considering.

And we find out if the fact that the US economy is beginning to show signs of strength, will affect the outcome in November.

Roger will be joined throughout the programme by two guests: Tony Nash, Chief Economist, Complete Intelligence who’s in Houston and Laura Schwartz, former Advisor to Bill Clinton and democratic strategist, who’s in Chicago.

Transcript

BBC

Hello, and welcome to Business Matters. I’m Roger Herring. Coming up on the program today, millions of voters in the US choose their party’s candidate for the November presidential election on what’s called Super Tuesday. But how are they feeling about the prospect of Biden versus Trump round two?

BBC

Well, we’re going to be hearing from those who have made up their minds and those who are still considering and ask if the fact that the US economy is beginning to show signs of strength will affect the outcome in November. And I’ll be joined throughout the program by two guests, Tony Nash, chief economist, Complete Intelligence, who’s joining us on the line from Houston. Tony, I should say hello to you.

Tony

Hello, Roger.

BBC

Good to have you there with us. And, Tony, I mean, for the Republicans, it is pretty much a coronation, wouldn’t you say?

Tony

Overall, yeah, there’s nobody left. I mean, you may have the four republican voters in Vermont vote for Nikki Haley, but aside from that, I really don’t think she’s going to win much today.

BBC

All right. Fair point. Well, we shall see. She hasn’t said her campaign is over yet. We’ll talk about that. But let’s just bring ourselves up, just be, to what has been happening, because it has been the biggest day so far in the US election year. Millions of people voting in what’s known as Super Tuesday. And the idea is you decide who should be the Republican and who should be the Democrat candidate for November’s presidential election. Now, polling has been taking place in more than a dozen states. The results are only expected to reinforce, as we said, the near certainty that Joe Biden and Donald Trump will face each other again in November. Well, speaking to reporters a little bit earlier, President Biden was pretty defiant about his polling. All right. Well, thanks very much for the moment, Michel. We’ll come back to you in a little while, a little bit later in the program to get an update and see what’s happening and perhaps get some sense of other issues that may be working their way through this election year. But now let me come to my guests, Tony and Laura. So, Tony, first of all, let me come to you.

BBC

Do you get the sense then that this process, this primary process, isn’t really what we’ve had in the past, what we’ve expected, where there’s been at least an element of doubt as to the outcome? And so for that reason, is it more of a drama? Have any issues come up in the process that have been useful?

Tony

Well, one thing about your earlier conversation, there are states where you vote in a partisan primary, but you don’t necessarily have to be a member of that party. So we have, like in Virginia, according to Exopolan, I was just looking at half of the people who voted for Nikki Haley were Democrats. And so this is how the different parties game some of these. And I would say this is a pretty big issue, especially in this primary.

BBC

Sorry, just run that one past me. You’re saying that the Democrats, people who are registered Democrats, can vote for the Republican candidates in some states.

Tony

So I live in Texas. In Texas, you do not have to be a registered Republican to vote in the republican primary. And so this is something that’s been happening for, I don’t know, the past three, four election cycles where party members will go in and vote in the other party’s primary to kind of try to push things one way or another. So since there is really nobody running against Joe Biden because he’s the incumbent, it really is kind of open and fair game for Democrats to try to change the republican primaries. So I voted here in Texas. I’m a Republican. And there were all of the previous names on the ballot. It wasn’t just Donald Trump. There were, I think, seven or eight Republicans to choose from. So just so your listeners understand, Republicans don’t just walk in the door, and Donald Trump is the only name on the ballot. There are many names. If those names are submitted to the state and qualify in time for the primary.

BBC

Interesting. We’ll see about that. Tony, let me bring you in on this, because that point that Laura was making about the court case, and we do know that one criminal trial will happen at least before the election. How much do you think that actually will matter in terms of voters, particularly GOP voters?

Tony

Obviously, it won’t matter. I mean, honestly, I live in the suburbs. I know both men and women. I’m a relatively social person, and I don’t know a single person who that matters for. And so we see this as responses, but I haven’t heard of a single person. Donald Trump being a dog is. I mean, that’s old news, so nobody really cares. I think that the biggest issue that people are facing right now is immigration, and that’s what everybody’s talking about. And that will weigh on Biden more than anything else. More than his corruption, his son’s corruption, his brother’s corruption. Immigration will weigh on Biden. And that campaign more than anything else, because there was some news, I think, out today saying the administration flew 300,000 illegal immigrants into the US. They flew them in to avoid the optics of them crossing the border. And so american citizens are paying for that. They’re paying for these people to be illegally transported and to reside illegally in the US. So we see what’s happening in New York City. We see what’s happening outside of Boston. We see what’s happening in Chicago. These very traditionally democratic cities are having to contend with the things that people like me in Texas on the border.

BBC

Because, I should say, of the movement of people coming over the border, often by republican governors in the south up to these cities.

Tony

Yes and no. Yes. I mean, our governor in Texas has done a lot of that to start that, to bus people up to DC and New York and Boston and Chicago and other places. But the Biden administration itself has flown in 300,000 illegal immigrants into the US. This was just a story out today. So they’re paying airfare, they’re taking Americans off of planes, they’re flying on flights, and then they’re getting vouchers and debit cards once they arrive here. And that’s a massive, massive issue for.

BBC

So you think that will actually dictate where a lot of people go in November will be that issue more than anything else?

Tony

Yes. Especially as we see more layoffs from companies. The displacement that that cohort has for, say, inner city and lower wage workers is huge. And so, again, these are traditionally Democrat voters. And so that immigration issue, it just won’t stop and everybody is talking about it.

BBC

Well, we shall see. That’s a very interesting line that you put there and one I have heard as well before. Anyway, we’re going to move on to the next part of the program. We’re going to be looking at some of what the economy might do to that vote in November. We’re going to say, Tony, let me pick that theme up with you, because do you feel, as someone working in the US economy, do you feel that things are getting better? I mean, you can see, I guess, from the stock market is certainly seeming to reflect that.

Tony

Yeah. So there are a couple of different things. First is inflation. It’s undoubtedly, on average, things are, I think, 24% more expensive today than they were in 2019. So inflation is without a doubt another massive issue this year. The stock market is really about four concentrated stocks, okay? It’s about Microsoft, it’s about Nvidia, it’s about Amazon and it’s about Apple. So when we see the general indices move up and down every day. Money is so concentrated in Nvidia, Microsoft and so on, that’s not necessarily impacting the stock market as a whole. So these are people betting on artificial intelligence. If you look at general stock market performance on the year, it’s down, I think, high single or low double digits so far this year. The general stock market, if you take out those four stocks, and we do see a lot of layoffs, other things. So it’s hard to argue that we’re in a terrible economy. I’m not saying that’s the case at all. But when we look at inflation and when we look know if people are standing still, they’re losing money. Right. Why is that happening? Well, it initially happened because of Fed policy.

Tony

Loose fed policy. Right. And so today it’s happening because Janet Yellen is using the treasury general account as her own personal kind of campaign funds. She’s spending the treasury general account like wildfire. And that is helping to sustain the prices in the US and keeping things up. So Congress has very limited power to stop her from doing that. But Yellen spending from the TGA is one of the biggest issues that nobody talks about, and it’s really keeping inflation up in the US.

BBC

Okay, well, listening to all that, Tony Nash. Tony, I guess that didn’t really surprise you, the kind of things we were hearing there.

Tony

No, it completely validated things that I’ve been telling you for the last 45 minutes. I mean, people on the ground are feeling it. If you’re sitting in New York or Boston or DC, and if you, Roger, are interviewing a talking head sitting in one of those places, they’re not going to tell you this stuff. But you just interviewed two people on the ground and they’re telling you exactly the stresses that they’re feeling.

BBC

Okay, well, let’s. Nash in Houston. It is interesting to hear where these things are going and interesting that John Zogby certainly seemed to think that the legal troubles of Trump may be actually quite instrumental. And I know you disagree with that. You’re not convinced, are you?

Tony

I’m not. I really think inflation and immigration and the people I talk to, and they’re across, I have 20 somethings who work for me and I have a 60 year old who works for me and I talk to, of course, people who don’t work for me. But I get a cross section across every day and I’m not hearing Trump’s legal concerns as an issue. But I’m sure in places like New York or San Francisco or DC, it’s a major issue where media is. But I think, Roger, the major, I think issue this November will be who will show up to vote. And if people are ambivalent about Biden and they don’t show up, then Trump’s going to win. If people are ambivalent about Trump and they don’t show up, then Biden’s going to win. I think that’s a bigger fact than anything because we got a couple of 80 year olds running. It’s really hard to get enthused. You can’t have like an Obama wave.

BBC

Well, I think we seem to have.

Tony

2008 or even a Trump wave.

BBC

We’re just losing the line a little bit to you there, Teddy.

Tony

And with all this other stuff and.

BBC

The partisanship, people, I think we’re just losing the line to you slightly there. But yeah, just a final thought. Does it matter very briefly in a word, or could, we heard you there a little bit there, Tony, thanks very much there. The line getting in the way of that at the end. But I hope we got a decent picture there of Super Tuesday and what it means, just to let you know that at the top of the hour, polls will close in Colorado, Minnesota and Texas. And we’ll bring you up to speed, of course, with projections from that. But that’s it from this special edition of Business matters on super cheesy bye.